Thursday, March 29, 2012
Changing the table schema in Subscriber (only)?
I have to alter a column on a replicated table and because I cannot
have any downtime, I'm thinking about just alter a column in Subscriber
only. I tested out in the test environment if I could just alter a
column in subscriber only and it worked. Now i'm wondering if this way
is ok or not.
Thanks in advance
-December
This is a transactional replication (immediate updating).
|||This is a transactional replication (immediate updating).
|||december wrote:
> This is a transactional replication (immediate updating).
which version of SQL Server you are using ?
SQL Server 2000 or 2005?
If you have SQL Server 2005 then alter table will work for most
changes.
Regards
Amish Shah
http://shahamishm.tripod.com
|||I'm using SQL Server 2000
amish wrote:
> december wrote:
> which version of SQL Server you are using ?
> SQL Server 2000 or 2005?
> If you have SQL Server 2005 then alter table will work for most
> changes.
> Regards
> Amish Shah
> http://shahamishm.tripod.com
|||december wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> I'm using SQL Server 2000
> amish wrote:
You can use sp_repladdcolumn or sp_repldropcolumn in SQL Server 2000.
If you are changing only at subscriber you can not get its effect on
your publisher.
Regards
Amish Shah
http://shahamishm.tripod.com
Changing the table schema in Subscriber (only)?
I have to alter a column on a replicated table and because I cannot
have any downtime, I'm thinking about just alter a column in Subscriber
only. I tested out in the test environment if I could just alter a
column in subscriber only and it worked. Now i'm wondering if this way
is ok or not.
Thanks in advance
-DecemberThis is a transactional replication (immediate updating).|||This is a transactional replication (immediate updating).|||december wrote:
> This is a transactional replication (immediate updating).
which version of SQL Server you are using ?
SQL Server 2000 or 2005?
If you have SQL Server 2005 then alter table will work for most
changes.
Regards
Amish Shah
http://shahamishm.tripod.com|||I'm using SQL Server 2000
amish wrote:
> december wrote:
>
> which version of SQL Server you are using ?
> SQL Server 2000 or 2005?
> If you have SQL Server 2005 then alter table will work for most
> changes.
> Regards
> Amish Shah
> http://shahamishm.tripod.com|||december wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> I'm using SQL Server 2000
> amish wrote:
You can use sp_repladdcolumn or sp_repldropcolumn in SQL Server 2000.
If you are changing only at subscriber you can not get its effect on
your publisher.
Regards
Amish Shah
http://shahamishm.tripod.comsql
Changing the table schema in Subscriber (only)?
I have to alter a column on a replicated table and because I cannot
have any downtime, I'm thinking about just alter a column in Subscriber
only. I tested out in the test environment if I could just alter a
column in subscriber only and it worked. Now i'm wondering if this way
is ok or not.
Thanks in advance
-DecemberThis is a transactional replication (immediate updating).|||This is a transactional replication (immediate updating).|||december wrote:
> This is a transactional replication (immediate updating).
which version of SQL Server you are using ?
SQL Server 2000 or 2005?
If you have SQL Server 2005 then alter table will work for most
changes.
Regards
Amish Shah
http://shahamishm.tripod.com|||I'm using SQL Server 2000
amish wrote:
> december wrote:
> > This is a transactional replication (immediate updating).
> which version of SQL Server you are using ?
> SQL Server 2000 or 2005?
> If you have SQL Server 2005 then alter table will work for most
> changes.
> Regards
> Amish Shah
> http://shahamishm.tripod.com|||december wrote:
> I'm using SQL Server 2000
> amish wrote:
> > december wrote:
> >
> > > This is a transactional replication (immediate updating).
> > which version of SQL Server you are using ?
> > SQL Server 2000 or 2005?
> >
> > If you have SQL Server 2005 then alter table will work for most
> > changes.
> >
> > Regards
> > Amish Shah
> > http://shahamishm.tripod.com
You can use sp_repladdcolumn or sp_repldropcolumn in SQL Server 2000.
If you are changing only at subscriber you can not get its effect on
your publisher.
Regards
Amish Shah
http://shahamishm.tripod.com
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Changing the schema ownership on subscriber
Hi,
I have a replication in which publisher, distributer and subscriber all runing on sql server 2005. all the tables that needs to be replicated are under 'dbo' schema on publisher.
Subscriber is a datawarehouse so i dont want to put tables coming from a system to go under dbo schema as there might be other application replicating same name tables to warehouse. i have created a schema for my application on warehouse but dont know how to tell replication to create tables under application schema created on subscriber. I am using snapshot replication that can be reinitialized if required.
any help will be appriciated.
Cheers,
Furrukh baig
Just found it myself. go to publication properties. click articles and then right click on any article and select "set properties for all tables" ... this will open the property window ... look for "destination object owner" and specify the value of schema name on target.
thanks,
Furrukh Baig
Changing the sa password of publisher and subscriber
Hi,
I have publish the data which have two subscriber ,one is in local network and other one is through internet.
Now As per compnay policy i am going to change tha sa password of Publisher and subscriber.
So i want know that it will effect replication or not.
if it will then what should i do to change the sa password.
Regards
Sanjay Tiwari
Depending on how you setup your repl. I suggest you take a look at Vyas' article.http://vyaskn.tripod.com/repl_ans4.htmsql
Monday, March 19, 2012
Changing sql dbo user password (will this effect current replication)
replication user. Will this effect current publications to that
subscriber?
tia
-comb
Comb,
dbo is a database user rather than a login, so whose password is being
changed? Also, are you using SQL or trusted authentication for the
subscription?
Cheers,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)
|||Yes, this account that you are using will have to be updated at the
publisher.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"combfilter" <asdf@.adsf.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d53fb2b4158876c9896af@.news.newsreader.co m...
> We have a subscriber that want's to change the dbo password for the
> replication user. Will this effect current publications to that
> subscriber?
> tia
> -comb
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
changing owner of the subscriber
Afrer i replicate my database, the tables that i replicated have been
created with the owner of the user i've accessed to the subscriber database,
instead of updating the data on my original tables that has dbo owner.
Is there a way to use replication to update the dbo tables?
' 03-5611606
' 050-7709399
: roy@.atidsm.co.il
Right click on your publication, select properties, click on the articles
tab. Click on the browse button to the right of each of your tables, and in
the general tab, enter dbo for destination table owner.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"Roy Goldhammer" <roy@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ezEA$uCHGHA.2460@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Hello there
> Afrer i replicate my database, the tables that i replicated have been
> created with the owner of the user i've accessed to the subscriber
> database, instead of updating the data on my original tables that has dbo
> owner.
> Is there a way to use replication to update the dbo tables?
> --
>
> ' 03-5611606
> ' 050-7709399
> : roy@.atidsm.co.il
>